RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ultrasound is becoming an essential tool for hand surgeons, but most of them are trained on the job, without any diploma or dedicated training. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of hand surgeons new to ultrasound to identify hand and wrist anatomical structures. METHODS: A monocentric study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2022. Ten residents and five attending hand surgeons, ultrasound novices, were involved in this study. The participants underwent two tests, wherein they were required to identify 17 anatomical structures using ultrasound, on the same subject. The second test was similar and carried out 2 to 6 weeks later by all participants. The number of structures successfully identified and if it was the case, the detection time per structure, were recorded. The correlations between participants age, years of surgical experience, surgical background (orthopedic or plastic) and the ability to perform immediately during the first test or to progress between the two tests were also assessed. RESULTS: The average number of structures identified during the first test (T1) was 14.1+/-2.1 (82.9%), versus 16.2+/-0.8 (95.3%) structures during the second test (T2) (p = 0.001). The mean detection time per structure was 53.4 +/- 18.9 s during T1 versus 27.7 +/- 7.2 s during T2 (p < 0.0001). A moderate negative correlation between the progression in the number of anatomical structures identified between the two tests and the years of surgical experience (ρ=-0.56; p = 0.029) was found. The other parameters were neither correlated with the ability to perform at the first test nor with the progression between the two tests. CONCLUSION: Hand surgeons new to ultrasound are most of the time able to identify hand and wrist anatomical structures. Comparison of their first and second tests showed significant potential for improvement in anatomical structure identification and detection time of those, especially in surgeons with limited surgical experience.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Several reports have suggested that transverse arches between the radial and ulnar sides of dorsal hand skin supply the proximal part of the skin. The main objective of the study was to provide an anatomical and radiological description of a superficial vascular arch in the proximal third of the metacarpals of the long fingers. METHODS: We dissected 11 hands after injection with a mixture of lead and resin. A CT scan was performed before dissection. All vessels supplying the skin were individualized on the back of the hand and measured. RESULTS: A superficial perforating dorsal arch of the hand was present in all cases in this study. It was supplied by a dorsal radial perforating artery arising from the radial artery and by a dorsal ulnar perforating artery arising from the dorsal carpal arch. The distal recurrences of the intermetacarpal spaces communicated with this arch. This arch was the only source of vascularization of thess proximal third of the third space and presented a dominant ulnar side in the majority of cases. It presented numerous anatomical variations. The source vessels had mean diameters of 0.5 mm. There was an excellent radiological-anatomical correlation on CT scan. CONCLUSION: Given the constancy of this arch in the study, perforating flaps not yet described could be considered, having as pivot points the ulnar or radial origin of this arch.
